Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (censored): the book vs. the movie

The Adventures of Huck Finn (1993) — the Disney version, with Elijah Wood as Huck and Courtney B. Vance as Jim · The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1960) — the MGM CinemaScope version, with boxer Archie Moore as Jim

Read first, or watch first?

For most families the book comes first here, and for one specific reason: the 1993 film has already answered the question Twain spends the novel asking, so watching first tells your reader how the moral crisis resolves before they've felt it build. If your kid is younger than the book, though, the film is a real door rather than a lesser copy — it's warm, it's PG, and Elijah Wood and Courtney B. Vance are genuinely good together. Just say plainly which parts were changed, because a kid who loved the movie will hit Tom Sawyer's arrival in chapter thirty-three with no warning at all. Whichever order you pick, read the content note first.

What the movie changed

01

Tom Sawyer never arrives

In the novel Tom turns up at the Phelps farm and takes over. Disney cuts him completely — he isn't so much as mentioned — so Huck frees Jim himself and takes the bullet Tom takes in the book. It is a cleaner story and a smaller one.

02

The last ten chapters are gone

The film ends with Jim freed by Miss Watson's will and Huck lighting out, saying he's been civilized before. The novel spends its final quarter on Tom's elaborate 'rescue' of a man who is already legally free, which is the part critics have argued about for a century.

03

The word is not in the film

Disney's adaptation is rated PG and never uses the novel's central slur, while keeping the anti-racist arc intact. For a lot of families that single fact decides the order things happen in, and it is worth knowing before movie night rather than after.

04

The 1960 version moves Huck's disguise

MGM cut the scene where Huck dresses as a girl and Judith Loftus sees straight through him — and moved the disguise to the end, for breaking Jim out of jail. Tom Sawyer doesn't appear in that one either; no film has ever wanted the ending Twain wrote.

What only the book has

01

The voice, which is the whole book

Huck narrates everything, and the comedy is in how he reports it rather than what happens. He describes the Grangerfords' parlor with total admiration and no idea he is cataloguing bad taste. No camera has anywhere to put that.

02

The letter

Huck writes to Miss Watson telling her where Jim is, feels washed clean, then thinks about the raft and tears it up: 'All right, then, I'll go to hell.' The book stages it as a boy alone with a piece of paper, believing he has just damned himself for doing the kindest thing he ever did.

03

The apology in the fog

Huck plays a trick on Jim, and Jim's answer — that he'd been grieving, and the trick was trash — is one of the quietest and hardest moments in American fiction. Huck says it took him fifteen minutes to work himself up to apologizing, and that he was never sorry for it.

04

Emmeline Grangerford's death poetry

A dead teenage girl's sketchbook of mourning verse, quoted in full, including an ode to a boy who fell down a well. It is funny and awful at once, and it is the sort of thing only a novel has room to keep.

05

The river at night

Whole chapters where nothing happens but two people drifting, talking about stars and kings, letting the current do the work. The films need a plot; the book can afford to just float, and those pages are why people reread it as adults.

Making it a movie night?Find the 1993 film on Amazon →
Ready for the real thing?Get the free ebook →

Film links are Amazon affiliate links. Works both directions, by the way: how to use a movie to spark the book →